Sunday, November 13, 2005

Frank Rich: 'We Do Not Torture' and Other Funny Stories

'We Do Not Torture' and Other Funny Stories - New York Times: "The vice president, not satisfied that the C.I.A. had already been implicated in four detainee deaths, was busy lobbying Congress to give the agency a green light to commit torture in the future. Dana Priest of The Washington Post, having first uncovered secret C.I.A. prisons two years ago, was uncovering new 'black sites' in Eastern Europe, where ghost detainees are subjected to unknown interrogation methods redolent of the region's Stalinist past. Before heading south, Mr. Bush had been doing his own bit for torture by threatening to cast the first veto of his presidency if Congress didn't scrap a spending bill amendment, written by John McCain and passed 90 to 9 by the Senate, banning the 'cruel, inhuman or degrading' treatment of prisoners.

So when you watch the president stand there with a straight face and say, 'We do not torture' - a full year and a half after the first photos from Abu Ghraib - you have to wonder how we arrived at this ludicrous moment. The answer is not complicated. When people in power get away with telling bigger and bigger lies, they naturally think they can keep getting away with it. And for a long time, Mr. Bush and his cronies did. Not anymore.

The fallout from the Scooter Libby indictment reveals that the administration's credibility, having passed the tipping point with Katrina, is flat-lining. For two weeks, the White House's talking-point monkeys in the press and Congress had been dismissing Patrick Fitzgerald's leak investigation as much ado about nothing except politics and as an exoneration of everyone except Mr. Libby. Now the American people have rendered their verdict: they're not buying it. Last week two major polls came up with the identical finding, that roughly 8 in 10 Americans regard the leak case as a serious matter. One of the polls (The Wall Street Journal/NBC News) also found that 57 percent of Americans believe that Mr. Bush deliberately misled the country into war in Iraq and that only 33 percent now find him 'honest and straightforward,' down from 50 percent in January.

The Bush loyalists' push to discredit the Libby indictment failed because Americans don't see it as a stand-alone scandal but as the petri dish for a wider culture of lying that becomes more visible every day. The last-ditch argument rolled out by Mr. Bush on Veterans Day in his latest stay-the-course speech - that Democrats, too, endorsed dead-wrong W.M.D. intelligence - is more of the same. Sure, many Democrats (and others) did believe that Saddam had an arsenal before the war, but only the White House hyped selective evidence for nuclear weapons, the most ominous of all of Iraq's supposed W.M.D.'s, to whip up public fears of an imminent doomsday."

Another excellent op-ed from Mr. Rich.


At 3:04 PM, Blogger mikevotes said...

Thanks for putting that up.

I just can't bring myself to pay that much for a few NYTimes editorials a day.


At 3:09 PM, Blogger Cephas said...

The only reason I have access to TimesSelect is because I subscribe to the paper on the weekends. But I'm thinking about cutting that out, which will end my access to the columnists. Oh well. I'm not happy at all with this. There was a piece in the Sunday paper (by a business columnist who is behind the wall!) on the apparent success of this model for the NYT, in that something like 100,000 people have signed up. But they acknowledge problems, and lack of influence. So we'll see. Anyway, I wish I could put the whole column up! Maybe someday we'll live in a free land again...


Post a Comment

<< Home