Thursday, June 08, 2006

HuffPo - Kennedy vs. Manjoo, the debate continues on the "stolen election"

Eat The Press | Robert Kennedy and Farhad Manjoo: Was The 2004 Election Stolen? | The Huffington Post: "Salon's Farhad Manjoo challenges Robert Kennedy on his Rolling Stone article, 'Was The 2004 Election Stolen?' Manjoo says 'No' based on his finding of 'numerous errors of interpretation and his deliberate omission of key bits of data. ' Robert Kennedy responds, addressing Manjoo's points and gently chiding him for committing 'precisely the sins of omission and distortion that he accuses me of having perpetrated.' Salon Editor-in-Chief Joan Walsh weighs in to answer critics (many), and assure readers that Manjoo and Salon are not, in fact, evil pawns of Karl Rove. Impartial summation at Digby: 'It is a seriously open question as to what actually happened in Ohio in 2004.... What is beyond dispute either by Kennedy or Manjoo [is that] what happened in Ohio (if not elsewhere) stinks to high heaven.'"


Post a Comment

<< Home